Peer Review Policy

Overview

Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines utilizes a sophisticated online submission, review, and tracking system to ensure a swift and high-quality review process. The Journal promises a revision timeline not exceeding six months, culminating in the publication of the research article.

Editorial Commitment

The Editorial Committee of Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, together with the Editor-in-Chief, is committed to upholding ethical and honest practices in supporting both established and emerging scholars in the field of Human Resource Management. The journal offers a supportive and broad platform for innovative thinkers and new researchers in this domain.

Submission and Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines undergo a rigorous peer review to ensure they meet high scholarly standards. Submissions must contribute meaningfully to the field of Human Resource Management, encompassing a wide range of topics and methodologies. Even contributions that are modest yet significant are valued, as these are key elements our reviewers and editors consider during the assessment process.

Upon final verification, manuscripts are forwarded to the Editor-in-Chief who preliminarily evaluates them before initiating the peer review by at least two experts in the subject area. The corresponding author will be promptly informed by email about the editorial decision. Even manuscripts that are initially rejected are eligible for resubmission with recommended revisions.

Revision Process

Authors are required to provide a detailed response to reviewers' comments, indicating how the manuscript has been revised. The revised manuscript may be sent back to the original reviewers or new ones, depending on the decision of the editorial board member handling the submission.

Final Stages of Publication

Once all editorial concerns are addressed, the manuscript is formally accepted for publication. Authors will receive proofs of their manuscript to correct only typographical or factual errors; all such corrections must be approved by the production team. The Journal retains the final say on matters of style and the size of figures in the published article.